
Playing the Victim: How Sociopaths Con Legal Professionals (and Everyone Else)
Playing the Victim: How Sociopaths Con Legal Professionals (and Everyone Else) ©2023 Bill Eddy, LCSW, Esq. Sociopath is another word for antisocial personality disorder according to the diagnostic manual of mental health professionals, currently the DSM-5-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2022). One of the criteria for this personality is: “Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases or conning others for personal profit or pleasure.” (748) While research shows that this personality disorder is present in nearly four percent of adults (one out of every 25 people), few people consider that they are being lied to when a person says they are a victim of someone else’s bad behavior. Yet sociopaths constantly want to dominate others and conning is one of the easiest ways to do this—and get others to assist them. Sadly, this is especially true for legal professionals (lawyers, judges, mediators, therapists, law enforcement, and others), because they are trained and eager to protect victims from abusive people. Unfortunately, such false statements to legal professionals can land an innocent person in jail, a true victim of abuse accused of harming a perpetrator, an innocent person ordered to pay a scammer, or a child put in danger’s way. This article explains how such conning works and a simple way to avoid getting conned. How Conning Works A con is more than a lie. A con is designed to get you to do something you wouldn’t do if you knew the truth. This is why sociopaths are often known as “con artists.” There are several ways that they accomplish this: distraction, negative stereotyping, identifying your weaknesses, fabricating a crisis, and playing the victim. Distraction A simple example is the thief who gets you to look up at the sky (“look at that strange bird”) while picking your pocket. You certainly wouldn’t have given him your wallet on purpose and you wouldn’t have looked up at the sky if you knew you were being conned. When conning legal professionals, such con artists intensely point the finger at another person and claim that that person is acting badly. Most legal professionals then focus on how badly the other person is acting and analyze what actions should be taken against them. Most of the time, they don’t stop to consider that it is the accuser who may be acting badly. This allows the first person who claims abuse to be automatically believed and action taken against the “bad” other. Negative Stereotyping (Creating a Target of Blame) When one person makes enough emotional claims that another person is acting badly, the listener will often form a negative stereotype of that person. Once this has occurred, the listener will easily believe more complaints about that person and may even fabricate some of their own that seem to fit what such a bad actor would do. Psychological research on this subject was described years ago as “stereotype induction” in the book Jeopardy in the Courtroom (American Psychological Association, 1996). Another term I like to use is that the accuser focuses on someone they choose to be their target of blame, who usually has done nothing wrong. A more common term for all of this is a villain—the whole person is evil. Whatever the term, sociopaths attack the person in their efforts to create a distraction for their schemes. Take an example I have seen several times: A mother has been doing just fine as the primary custodial parent after a divorce. The father with sociopathic traits has a set-back in business or relationships and decides to look somewhere else for someone to dominate. He decides to take the child away from the mother and show the world that he is the primary custodial parent. This will put him in the position of dominating both the mother in court and the child in his home, and also helps him look good for getting dates. He files a motion in family court claiming that the mother is abusive, regularly interferes with him picking up the child, doesn’t put his name as a parent on the list at school, and doesn’t tell him about doctor’s appointments. This list of bad behavior creates a negative stereotype of the mother which grabs the attention of his lawyer, who argues successfully at court that the mother is a bad actor. The mother is flabbergasted at court and says none of this is true and that he is lying, but she is caught off-guard and isn’t organized to provide much evidence. The negative stereotype of the mother has already set in from the intensity of the father’s allegations. The court accepts the extensive list of bad behaviors as true and rules in favor of the father, while harshly telling the mother to stop blaming the father and take responsibility for her own behavior. That the mother was telling the truth was never considered. With short court hearings, this happens more than most people realize. Identifying Your Weaknesses Sociopaths are brilliant at figuring out your vulnerabilities. Many legal professionals have their favorite problems they like to solve, which sociopaths are eager to manipulate. Some professionals focus on a class of victims. For example, I knew a lawyer several years ago who represented clients with AIDS who had been discriminated against. One client she had worked with for over a year finally had a trial date coming up. Before the trial, she told him she needed the paperwork showing that he had AIDS. It turned out he never had it and had conned her into working hard on his case because he seemed like such a victim. In family law, some lawyers and therapists specialize in domestic violence and primarily take those cases. Some lawyers and therapists specialize in parental alienation and primarily take those cases. When determining parenting plans in and out of court in divorce cases, such a history can make a big difference. I have seen true domestic violence cases in which an abusive parent falsely alleged parental alienation to distract from